nobody has any idea how the world war mode (the one including ground vehicles) will play out. So for joystick users WT is certainly the way to go, but the mouse mode is just. but same is true for wargamings approach with the exception of random pilot kills. Modules and parts have hitpoints even if they are not displayed, though a critical hit might take them out instantly. There might be no display for hitpoints, but fire at a certain part of the plane long enough and it will crash. The flying with mouse in arcade and historic battles is very restricted, with an AI instructor keeping you from stalling and crashing, making the current WoWP mouse setup more realistic, especially compared to the WT arcade physics. But even though I like it very much it's not without its own problems. Use your brain, if there is any, when fighting against it and/or try it out on the testserver.
to everyone still whining about the SP's supposedly overpoweredness: And if all that weren't enough: Often, one should better use goldammo to achive anything in many situations, which is in turn seriously cutting the profits. If you get caught in the open by an agile tank, you really are in trouble, no matter the opponents tier. Aside from that, a lot of "dings" on the gun-attached armorbar, even from guns as small as 50mm(no shit!!!) have a good chance to take out SP's gun. Worse, at distances at which your enemy is already perfectly able to hit and penetrate 2 out of 3 shots at your top, you often seriously struggle to do the same to him, because of your REALLY crappy gun! Mind you, it is slow as shit, so you simply can't make up for that.Īnd if the enemy is an idiot, as anon already said, he probably just shoots the upper part of the frontal glacis (the line above the mg) and still penetrates with 225 pene rolls (120mm+ guns don't even need such a roll)! Or he turns on autoaim, which often hits either that, or the turretring.
That's not a very good résumé for a tank which is entirely depending on it's armor.Ī lot of players know to shoot the top of the turret (yes, it is NOT ONLY the cupola!) and that is an almost guaranteed penetration. And god forbid you'd platoon with a regular-matched t8-tank or a t6 arty! SP's armor is good as a toptier, but intermediate at best in a t9-battle. I can see the "dunning-kruger-effect" is strong with this one. "o really?! people buy this tank to park it sideways and inviting enemies to shoot in his side's armor - LOL"Īpparently the position of your opponents hull towards you, ONLY depends on the enemies movements (in one of the slowest tanks), rather than your own. That zMe ul guy is posting a lot of bs here, yet has no clue whatsoever.
Whether they removed it to rework and rebalance it completely or it is gone for good, IMO the removal was a good decision and a lesson to people who complain about anything and everything without much thinking. They even plan to increase Tigers speeds, centurions speed. How do you know they wouldn't have buffed the tank in terms of accuracy, penetration or other such things if it would underperform?ĭon't get me wrong, WG is doing a lot things wrong, business model, PR in which customer service might take a lead as the worst, but you can see they are trying to get better. How do you know that with the changed angle of Super Pershing HEAT shells would not be performing similarly to how they perform now? No, it is better to moan and whine that it is not fair what they are PLANNING, not even introduced yet, no one knows how it would have affected the said tank ffs. But the nerf to the HEAT shells they don't see as a buff to their tank. Now when they wanted to repair the model of Super Pershing people suddenly get highly offended. People moaned about historical accuracy that, historical accuracy this, so they started repairing old models to more accurately reflect whats historical. Everything that is just a little not like in their own little imaginary land is moaned about. I'm sorry if you feel differently, but imo it serves right the whinny community.
0 kommentar(er)
